<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Supply Chain Signal</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/</id><updated>2026-07-19T19:50:00.000Z</updated><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/feed.xml" rel="self"/><entry><title>NIST makes supply-chain cyber risk an enterprise discipline—not a supplier questionnaire</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/nist-turns-scrm-into-enterprise-discipline/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/nist-turns-scrm-into-enterprise-discipline/"/><updated>2026-07-19T19:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T19:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The updated SP 800-161 record connects strategy, criticality, acquisition, assessment, monitoring, and response across organizational levels.</summary></entry><entry><title>The EU CSDDD revision moves the timeline, not the supply-chain evidence problem</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/eu-csddd-revision-moves-the-timeline-not-the-evidence-problem/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/eu-csddd-revision-moves-the-timeline-not-the-evidence-problem/"/><updated>2026-07-19T18:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T18:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The 2026 revision changes scope and application timing while leaving buyers with a continuing need to distinguish legal applicability from mapping and risk-platform claims.</summary></entry><entry><title>EUDR turns geolocation into an operating data chain—not a map layer</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/eudr-turns-geolocation-into-an-operating-data-chain/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/eudr-turns-geolocation-into-an-operating-data-chain/"/><updated>2026-07-19T17:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T17:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The official due-diligence record connects covered product, supplier, production geography, legality evidence, risk assessment, mitigation, and statement workflows.</summary></entry><entry><title>ISO 22301 keeps recovery beyond the control-tower dashboard</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/iso-22301-keeps-recovery-beyond-the-dashboard/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/iso-22301-keeps-recovery-beyond-the-dashboard/"/><updated>2026-07-19T16:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T16:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The continuity standard requires a managed capability around impact, strategy, plans, exercises, response, recovery, and improvement.</summary></entry><entry><title>ISO 28000 separates cargo-security management from tracking</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/iso-28000-separates-cargo-security-from-tracking/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/iso-28000-separates-cargo-security-from-tracking/"/><updated>2026-07-19T15:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T15:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>A location event can support security operations, but the management-system record retains risk assessment, controls, incidents, monitoring, and improvement.</summary></entry><entry><title>WCO SAFE links advance data to trade security without turning visibility into customs compliance</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/wco-safe-links-advance-data-to-trade-security/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/wco-safe-links-advance-data-to-trade-security/"/><updated>2026-07-19T14:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T14:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The framework organizes customs and business cooperation, advance information, risk management, and authorized-operator concepts.</summary></entry><entry><title>project44's current record shows the boundary between events and decisions</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/project44-record-shows-the-boundary-between-events-and-decisions/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/project44-record-shows-the-boundary-between-events-and-decisions/"/><updated>2026-07-19T13:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T13:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>Movement connects transportation events and prediction to operating workflows, but official product language does not establish network completeness or ETA performance.</summary></entry><entry><title>FourKites broadens the control-tower decision beyond transportation tracking</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/fourkites-broadens-the-control-tower-decision/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/fourkites-broadens-the-control-tower-decision/"/><updated>2026-07-19T12:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T12:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The current platform record spans transportation, orders, inventory, facilities, yards, and workflow, expanding both the opportunity and the integration burden.</summary></entry><entry><title>Planning suites converge on scenarios—but not on one decision model</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/planning-suites-converge-on-scenarios-but-not-one-decision-model/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/planning-suites-converge-on-scenarios-but-not-one-decision-model/"/><updated>2026-07-19T11:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T11:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>Kinaxis, Blue Yonder, o9, SAP, and Oracle all document scenario and planning capabilities, while horizons, data models, constraints, and decision rights remain buyer-specific.</summary></entry><entry><title>Visibility buyers need an event-provenance test before an ETA contest</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/visibility-buyers-need-an-event-provenance-test/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/visibility-buyers-need-an-event-provenance-test/"/><updated>2026-07-19T10:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T10:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>The useful demonstration begins with missing, stale, duplicated, corrected, and conflicting events—not a clean route animation.</summary></entry><entry><title>Supply-chain risk platforms map different kinds of exposure</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/risk-platforms-map-different-kinds-of-exposure/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/risk-platforms-map-different-kinds-of-exposure/"/><updated>2026-07-19T09:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T09:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>Everstream, Interos, Resilinc, Prewave, Exiger, Altana, and Sourcemap overlap on mapping and monitoring while using different evidence, identity, risk, and workflow models.</summary></entry><entry><title>UFLPA evidence needs a chain—not a screening result</title><id>https://supplychainsignal.com/news/uflpa-evidence-needs-a-chain-not-a-screening-result/</id><link href="https://supplychainsignal.com/news/uflpa-evidence-needs-a-chain-not-a-screening-result/"/><updated>2026-07-19T08:50:00.000Z</updated><published>2026-07-19T08:50:00.000Z</published><author><name>Supply Chain Signal Research Desk</name></author><summary>DHS's strategy joins entity information, product and supplier relationships, customs enforcement, and importer evidence under a legal process that software cannot decide.</summary></entry></feed>